Surface Finish Explained: Ra, Rz and Specifying Finishes Sensibly

Ra values appear on nearly every drawing, yet the number alone underspecifies a surface. What Ra and Rz actually measure, what common processes deliver, and how to specify without overpaying.

What Ra actually is

Ra is the arithmetic average of the absolute deviations of the surface profile from its mean line, measured over a defined sampling length (per ISO 4287 / ASME B46.1 practice). It is a height average: it describes roughness magnitude but says nothing about whether the surface is spiky, wavy, porous or smooth-plateaued — two surfaces with identical Ra can seal, slide and fatigue very differently.

Rz is a peak-to-valley measure (the average of the largest peak-to-valley heights over several sampling lengths). Rz responds to the isolated deep scratch or high peak that Ra averages away, which is why sealing faces and fatigue-critical parts are often specified with both Ra and Rz (or an Rz maximum). As a rough orientation only, Rz is commonly several times the Ra value on the same surface — the ratio varies widely with process and is not a conversion.

Units: micrometres (µm) in metric practice; microinches (µin) in US practice — 1 µm ≈ 40 µin. Confusing the two on a drawing inflates or starves a finish by a factor of 40.

What common processes deliver

Typical achievable ranges (well-run equipment; individual shops vary):

Process Typical Ra (µm)
Flame cut / sawn 12.5–50
Milled / turned (roughing) 3.2–12.5
Milled / turned (finishing) 0.8–3.2
Ground (surface/cylindrical) 0.2–1.6
Honed 0.1–0.8
Lapped / superfinished 0.025–0.2
Polished (decorative) 0.05–0.4 achievable, grade dependent

Note that as-supplied steel surfaces have their own values: hot-rolled plate is far rougher than these machining figures, and cold-rolled sheet typically sits around Ra 0.8–1.6 µm from the mill.

Specifying sensibly

  • Finer costs money non-linearly. Moving from Ra 3.2 to 0.8 to 0.2 µm adds processes (grinding, then honing or lapping), each with its own setup. Specify the coarsest finish the function allows.
  • Match the callout to the function: sliding and sealing surfaces, fatigue-critical fillets and bearing seats justify fine finishes and possibly Rz limits; clearance faces and weld preparations do not.
  • State the direction where it matters — lay (the direction of the surface pattern) affects sealing and friction; drawings use standard lay symbols when it does.
  • A frequent error is a blanket "Ra 0.8 everywhere" note inherited from another drawing: it quietly converts every face into a grinding operation. Restrict fine finishes to the faces that need them.
  • For stainless and corrosion service, remember roughness is also a corrosion variable: smoother, properly passivated surfaces resist pitting initiation better, and rougher finishes hold contaminants — a functional reason, not a cosmetic one, for finishing weld-adjacent areas.

Last updated 2026-11-03. Part of the Steel.Wiki guides — see all guides.